Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Buying vs Renting

For those in the situation where they have no interest in paying a landlord anymore, and want to put roughly the same monthly amount into a mortgage, here are some numbers for you.

BUT, part way down the page you will see the item for DOWN PAYMENT - you need to have some way of putting money down based on the value of the property you are looking.

My website http://millardhomes.ca has more information courtesy of CMHC on ways of mitigating this amount, or go straight to http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/co/buho/index.cfm

The formatting would not allow me to put lines around the boxes, sorry.  You can try right clicking on the Y or Year One, then dragging the mouse to the bottom right corner - helps a bit.


 YEAR ONE   YEAR TEN   YEAR 31 
 RENT   MORTGAGE   RENT   MORTGAGE   RENT   MORTGAGE 
           1,350                        13,489            1,650                        13,489            2,450  Paid Off 
         16,200  STRATA FEES           19,800  STRATA FEES           29,400  STRATA FEES 
                          2,400                           2,926                           4,050
 PROPERTY TAXES   PROPERTY TAXES   PROPERTY TAXES 
                          1,930                           2,480                           8,480
         16,200                        17,819          19,800                        18,895          29,400                        12,530
 PURCHASE PRICE    PURCHASE PRICE    PURCHASE PRICE  
                     250,000                      250,000                      250,000
 DOWN PAYMENT    DOWN PAYMENT    DOWN PAYMENT  
5% 5% 5%
                       12,500                        12,500                        12,500
 PRICE INCREASE / YR   PRICE INCREASE / YR   PRICE INCREASE / YR 
2% 2% 2%
 VALUE INCREASE   VALUE INCREASE   VALUE INCREASE 
                          5,000                        54,749                      211,897
 PRINCIPAL PAYDOWN   PRINCIPAL PAYDOWN   PRINCIPAL PAYDOWN 
                          4,235                        50,842                      237,500
 TAX FREE EQUITY   TAX FREE EQUITY   TAX FREE EQUITY 
                          9,235                      105,590                      449,397












































































































































































































































































Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Underground Oil Storage Tanks

The Real Estate Council of British Columbia's Professional Standards Manual says:

Underground or Above Ground Storage Tanks

All underground storage tanks (or above ground storage tanks over 2500 L) that supply oil burning equipment are regulated by the BC Fire Code. Unused or abandoned underground or above ground storage tanks should be properly decommissioned because they are a potential source of contamination of the soil and groundwater, may pose a fire and explosion hazard and may impact human health. The provision in the BC Fire Code for the decommissioning of an underground or above ground storage tank used for supplying oil burning equipment requires that the owner use good engineering practice when removing, abandoning in place, or temporarily taking out of service the underground or above ground storage tank.
Licensees who are involved with the sale of a property that contains, or is thought to contain, an underground or above ground storage tank should be aware that the presence of an underground or above ground storage tank is a significant concern and should also be aware of their duties with respect to disclosure in this regard. Licensees should familiarize themselves with the BC Ministry of the Environment Fact Sheet on Residential Heating Oil Storage Tanks.
Listing agents have a duty to familiarize themselves with the property that they have listed and, where they suspect an unused or abandoned underground or above ground storage tank may be present, to take necessary steps to determine if one exists. If a seller is aware of an unused or abandoned underground or above ground storage tank, that seller has an obligation to disclose this fact. An unused or abandoned underground storage tank is considered to be a material latent defect and, therefore, its presence must be disclosed in writing as required by section 5-13 of the Council Rules.
Similarly, if a buyer’s agent is aware that an unused or abandoned underground or above ground storage tank is present, he or she has a duty to disclose this fact to buyers and further advise that its presence is an environmental concern. A buyer’s agent should also recommend that buyers familiarize themselves with the requirements of the BC Fire Code and any restrictions that the local municipality may have concerning unused or abandoned underground or above ground storage tanks. This is particularly important in municipalities where underground or above ground storage tank removal enforcement is a priority. As each municipality has different requirements and provisions for enforcing the removal or abandonment of underground or above ground storage tanks, a prudent licensee should be aware of the local requirements (usually administered by the fire department).
Lending institutions and insurers may also have corporate policy regarding underground or above ground storage tanks.
When drafting contracts with respect to properties containing underground or above ground storage tanks, licensees should familiarize themselves with the information found in Safety, Health and Environmental Disclosure Clauses below.
Finally, a buyer’s agent should advise buyers to have the property inspected and to seek expert opinion on the matter, especially if the underground or above ground storage tank is thought to be leaking.

The referenced links are worth a close read.

____________



In another forum, namely the BC Real Estate Council's Mandatory course, Real Estate E&O Insurance Legal Update 2011, the first topic is Oil Storage Tanks.

Some good stuff here, but some specific Contract Clauses are offered, also a process called Site Profiling which is not usual in Residential property situations, but offers a way for any Seller or Buyer to have a site professionally checked as required.


The Real Estate E&O Insurance Legal Update 2011, offers the following.  That even if the law does not require a site profile in the circumstances, the Council suggest that a seller complete and deliver a site profile to the buyer as a form of disclosure.  Where the parties negotiate the need for a site profile the Real Estate Council of BC suggest the following clauses:

Seller's Site Profile Clause
The Seller, at his or her expense, will provide to the Buyer a completed site profile (Schedule 1 of the B.C. Contaminated Sites Regulation) for the subject property by ________________date_______.
The Seller warrants that the information contained therein is true and correct to the best of the Seller's knowledge.

Buyer's Site Profile Clause
Subject to the Buyer reviewing and approving the site profile by ________________date______.
This condition is for the sole benefit of the Buyer.


____________

From an INSURANCE perspective:

I am advised that they will unquestioningly accept the FD Inspection Certificate and insure a property.  BUT, the BIG caveat, IF contamination is subsequently found NO insurance company offers coverage.  YOU ARE ON YOUR OWN.

Thanks, eh?

____________


A buried and decommissioned oil storage can be grouped as a Disclosed Material Latent Defect, but most people figure that since it is decommissioned it is no longer a Latent Defect.  The Standard Clauses in Webforms has a clause for Disclosed Material Latent Defects.

____________



A question I have on my mind:

IF a tank was decommissioned under a local Fire Department permit, and therefore inspected by the FD personnel, AND subsequently the tank is removed and there is evidence of oil leakage and soil contamination upon removal, WHO is responsible for the costs of remediation?

Three parties appear in my sights: the land owner at the time of the decommissioning, and/or previous owners, the tank decommissioning contractor, the Municipality and its Fire Department.

The Fact Sheet linked above says consult a lawyer familiar with all of this.  $$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

____________


IN SUMMARY:

Something tells me the site profile is a way to go, and, after all, this is the most recent and focused advice from our Council in BC.

Selling and Buying the Lease in a BC Leasehold Condo Building

Some History:
In the days before the Condominium Act became law (1972???, later the Strata Property Act), if you wished to own a registered interest in a Condo it is most likely you owned a whole building, or you were able to purchase a sub-lease involving one of many specific condo units in the building.

The entity who owns the whole building has control over all sorts of aspects of the building.  This includes all matters to do with the owners of the sub-leases.  The terms of a sub-lease are specific to each building.

Operationally, rules are written, in most cases new owners are vetted, and all aspects from rentals to parking are under the  control of the building owner.

Financial:
Of particular interest to a sub-lease owner, the lessee, are the capital and operating costs that occur annually and at times when the building components, roof, heating systems, common area facilities are maintained, upgraded or replaced.  There is no lessee involvement in the financial aspects, levels of operating maintenance, or planning for capital projects.  Charges are divided up in relation to the relative size of your condo, so akin to the Unit Entitlement processes under the Strata Property Act.

However, if operating or project costs go over budget there is no input by the lessees and and invoice is presented for you to pay.

Unit Sales:
The other aspect of these buildings and their sub-leases is the value in the real estate market when a registered owner is moving on.  They are typically a cheaper alternative to buying a Strata condo.  They are often well sized as they are older properties, but the financial issues mentioned are something for all sellers to make their agents aware of.  Similarly a buyer's agent must get all the financial information.  In the Strata world a Form B would be requested - it is this same information that needs to be provided for these leasehold buildings.  The only way to limit your clients exposure to financial surprises.

Strata Property Act:
An EXCELLENT way to think of the issues and impact of any of this on the registered owner of a sub-lease, is to refer to all the sections of the Strata Property Act.

Some specific areas - but by no means limited to these, would be found under:
There are no By Laws, and therefore you and the other owners have no input into the way the building is operated and the rules under which it is managed.
You are not an owner in fee simple of your unit plus a portion of common property
There is no Strata Council acting on your behalf, and which you can join.  Therefore there is no Strata Corporation, or AGM or Special Meetings at which you input can be provided.
There are no monthly Strata Council Meetings that you can attend.
If there is a caretaker, this person is an employee of  the building owner
Annual budgets are only provided if deemed desirable by the building owners and you do not have direct input on levels of service or related costs.
Similarly, capital project budgets are only provided if deemed desirable by the building owners and you do not have direct input on he extent and timing of the work.


IN SUMMARY:
Caveat Emptor, and the agents for the seller and buyer need to be able to give you good service and set you up with good knowledge.